Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: storage v2 #5027

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

fix: storage v2 #5027

merged 12 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

Maddiaa0
Copy link
Member

@Maddiaa0 Maddiaa0 commented Mar 7, 2024

Overview

Works around brillig blowup issue by altering the read and write opcodes to take in arrays of data. This is potentially just a short term fix.

  • Reading and writing to storage now take in arrays, code will not compile without this change, due to an ssa issue -> ISSUE

  • Tag checks on memory now just make sure the tag is LESS than uint64, rather than asserting that the memory tag is uint32, this should be fine.

  • We had to blow up the memory space of the avm to u64 as the entire noir compiler works with u64s. Arrays will not work unless we either

sirasistant and others added 2 commits March 7, 2024 10:48
subrepo:
  subdir:   "noir"
  merged:   "c44ef1484"
upstream:
  origin:   "https://github.com/noir-lang/noir"
  branch:   "master"
  commit:   "c44ef1484"
git-subrepo:
  version:  "0.4.6"
  origin:   "???"
  commit:   "???"
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class AvmFlavor {
static constexpr size_t NUM_ALL_ENTITIES = 91;

using Relations =
std::tuple<Avm_vm::avm_alu<FF>, Avm_vm::avm_main<FF>, Avm_vm::avm_mem<FF>, equiv_inter_reg_alu_relation<FF>>;
std::tuple<Avm_vm::avm_alu<FF>, Avm_vm::avm_mem<FF>, Avm_vm::avm_main<FF>, equiv_inter_reg_alu_relation<FF>>;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just regenerated these file to get around a conflict, they are just ordering changes ( as codegen is yet to be deterministic )
( nothing to see here ! )

@Maddiaa0 Maddiaa0 marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2024 11:41
@Maddiaa0 Maddiaa0 requested a review from fcarreiro March 7, 2024 11:42
@Maddiaa0 Maddiaa0 enabled auto-merge (squash) March 7, 2024 12:14
@AztecBot
Copy link
Collaborator

AztecBot commented Mar 7, 2024

Benchmark results

No metrics with a significant change found.

Detailed results

All benchmarks are run on txs on the Benchmarking contract on the repository. Each tx consists of a batch call to create_note and increment_balance, which guarantees that each tx has a private call, a nested private call, a public call, and a nested public call, as well as an emitted private note, an unencrypted log, and public storage read and write.

This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here.

Values are compared against data from master at commit df089def and shown if the difference exceeds 1%.

L2 block published to L1

Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.

Metric 8 txs 32 txs 64 txs
l1_rollup_calldata_size_in_bytes 5,700 18,884 36,452
l1_rollup_calldata_gas 66,576 238,976 470,228
l1_rollup_execution_gas 194,524 500,282 909,486
l2_block_processing_time_in_ms 1,191 4,474 8,906 (+1%)
note_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 208 (+2%) 542 992 (+1%)
note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms 13.5 (+48%) 67.1 (-5%) 126 (+7%)
l2_block_building_time_in_ms 11,190 (-1%) 44,183 (-2%) 89,614 (+2%)
l2_block_rollup_simulation_time_in_ms 7,294 (-1%) 28,927 (-2%) 58,864 (+2%)
l2_block_public_tx_process_time_in_ms 3,867 (-2%) 15,189 (-2%) 30,601 (+2%)

L2 chain processing

Each column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.

Metric 5 blocks 10 blocks
node_history_sync_time_in_ms 13,833 (-5%) 26,880 (-3%)
note_history_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 1,275 (-4%) 2,327 (-3%)
note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms 93.9 (-24%) 96.5 (-25%)
node_database_size_in_bytes 18,780,240 35,573,840 (+1%)
pxe_database_size_in_bytes 29,923 59,478

Circuits stats

Stats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every circuit run across all benchmarks.

Circuit circuit_simulation_time_in_ms circuit_input_size_in_bytes circuit_output_size_in_bytes
private-kernel-init 250 (-2%) 44,736 28,001
private-kernel-ordering 194 52,625 14,627
base-rollup 655 177,932 997
root-rollup 68.4 4,320 825
private-kernel-inner 317 (-1%) 73,715 28,001
public-kernel-app-logic 170 (-1%) 32,254 25,379
merge-rollup 8.47 (-1%) 2,840 997

Tree insertion stats

The duration to insert a fixed batch of leaves into each tree type.

Metric 1 leaves 2 leaves 8 leaves 16 leaves 32 leaves 64 leaves 128 leaves 512 leaves 1024 leaves 2048 leaves 4096 leaves
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_ms 9.81 10.3 (-5%) 13.9 (+10%) 16.0 (-2%) 22.0 (-2%) 35.1 (-5%) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_count 16.9 17.5 23.0 31.6 47.0 79.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_ms 0.569 0.577 (-5%) 0.592 (+11%) 0.496 (-2%) 0.460 (-2%) 0.439 (-5%) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 45.9 71.1 (-3%) 230 (-2%) 438 (-4%) 868 (-2%) 1,715
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_count N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 96.0 159 543 1,055 2,079 4,127
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.470 0.439 (-3%) 0.419 (-2%) 0.410 (-4%) 0.413 (-2%) 0.411
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 53.4 105 (-2%) 338 (+1%) 649 (-2%) 1,304 2,605 (+2%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_count N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 104 207 691 1,363 2,707 5,395
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.475 0.476 (-1%) 0.460 (+1%) 0.447 (-2%) 0.451 0.453 (+2%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A 61.4 (+1%) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_count N/A N/A N/A N/A 109 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.537 (+1%) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Miscellaneous

Transaction sizes based on how many contracts are deployed in the tx.

Metric 0 deployed contracts
tx_size_in_bytes 19,179

Transaction processing duration by data writes.

Metric 0 new note hashes 1 new note hashes
tx_pxe_processing_time_ms 2,677 (-1%) 1,367 (-1%)
Metric 0 public data writes 1 public data writes
tx_sequencer_processing_time_ms 0.0340 (+14%) 475 (-1%)

@Maddiaa0 Maddiaa0 merged commit fe3190e into master Mar 7, 2024
93 of 94 checks passed
@Maddiaa0 Maddiaa0 deleted the md/storage branch March 7, 2024 15:13
AztecBot added a commit to noir-lang/noir that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2024
## Overview
Works around brillig blowup issue by altering the read and write opcodes
to take in arrays of data. This is potentially just a short term fix.

- Reading and writing to storage now take in arrays, code will not
compile without this change, due to an ssa issue ->[ ISSUE
](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4979)

- Tag checks on memory now just make sure the tag is LESS than uint64,
rather than asserting that the memory tag is uint32, this should be
fine.

- We had to blow up the memory space of the avm to u64 as the entire
noir compiler works with u64s. Arrays will not work unless we either
    - Make the avm 64 bit addressable ( probably fine )
- Make noir 32 bit addressable ( requires alot of buy in )
AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4814

---------

Co-authored-by: sirasistant <[email protected]>
AztecBot added a commit to noir-lang/noir that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2024
## Overview
Works around brillig blowup issue by altering the read and write opcodes
to take in arrays of data. This is potentially just a short term fix.

- Reading and writing to storage now take in arrays, code will not
compile without this change, due to an ssa issue ->[ ISSUE
](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4979)

- Tag checks on memory now just make sure the tag is LESS than uint64,
rather than asserting that the memory tag is uint32, this should be
fine.

- We had to blow up the memory space of the avm to u64 as the entire
noir compiler works with u64s. Arrays will not work unless we either
    - Make the avm 64 bit addressable ( probably fine )
- Make noir 32 bit addressable ( requires alot of buy in )
AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4814

---------

Co-authored-by: sirasistant <[email protected]>
PhilWindle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-package: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](aztec-package-v0.26.5...aztec-package-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Miscellaneous

* **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](barretenberg.js-v0.26.5...barretenberg.js-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Miscellaneous

* **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](aztec-cli-v0.26.5...aztec-cli-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract
([#5059](#5059))
([cb9fdc6](cb9fdc6))
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](aztec-packages-v0.26.5...aztec-packages-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* Basic public reverts
([#4870](#4870))
([5cccc78](5cccc78))
* Deploying new inbox
([#5036](#5036))
([fed729d](fed729d))
* Detect unknown note type ids in compute_note_hash
([#5086](#5086))
([6206bec](6206bec))
* Easy deployment of protocol contracts in e2e
([#4983](#4983))
([480161f](480161f))
* IPA documentation
([#4924](#4924))
([48bd22e](48bd22e))
* Nullifier read requests in public kernel
([#4910](#4910))
([0e44247](0e44247))
* Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract
([#5059](#5059))
([cb9fdc6](cb9fdc6))
* Updating an SMT solver class
([#4981](#4981))
([4b94d58](4b94d58))


### Bug Fixes

* Canonical contract address
([#5030](#5030))
([b2af880](b2af880))
* Flaky deployment test
([#5035](#5035))
([039eafc](039eafc))
* Pull the correct platform image for noir
([#5097](#5097))
([3342371](3342371))
* Sleep function memory leak
([#5023](#5023))
([a72cfea](a72cfea)),
closes
[#4817](#4817)
* Storage v2
([#5027](#5027))
([fe3190e](fe3190e))
* Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies
([#5066](#5066))
([507c374](507c374))


### Miscellaneous

* Address warnings in noir test suite
([#4966](#4966))
([7ef4ef5](7ef4ef5))
* Bootstrap noir natively if nargo is invalid
([#5034](#5034))
([df089de](df089de))
* Build avm transpiler if we are on mac
([#5039](#5039))
([c2966b9](c2966b9))
* **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests
([#5065](#5065))
([58e1ff4](58e1ff4))
* Cleanup of prover and verifier instances
([#4959](#4959))
([f2fdefd](f2fdefd))
* Delete bootstrap scripts from `noir/noir-repo`
([#5044](#5044))
([add91ca](add91ca))
* Disable `hello_world_example` noir test in aztec-packages CI
([#5061](#5061))
([1be9243](1be9243))
* Join-split example Part 1
([#4965](#4965))
([b9de0f5](b9de0f5))
* Moving RootRollupInputs impl
([#5087](#5087))
([f3d9f9b](f3d9f9b))
* Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops
are populated through function
([#5084](#5084))
([77954ab](77954ab))


### Documentation

* Parity circuit naming fixes
([#5076](#5076))
([c255255](c255255))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](barretenberg-v0.26.5...barretenberg-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* IPA documentation
([#4924](#4924))
([48bd22e](48bd22e))
* Updating an SMT solver class
([#4981](#4981))
([4b94d58](4b94d58))


### Bug Fixes

* Storage v2
([#5027](#5027))
([fe3190e](fe3190e))
* Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies
([#5066](#5066))
([507c374](507c374))


### Miscellaneous

* **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests
([#5065](#5065))
([58e1ff4](58e1ff4))
* Cleanup of prover and verifier instances
([#4959](#4959))
([f2fdefd](f2fdefd))
* Join-split example Part 1
([#4965](#4965))
([b9de0f5](b9de0f5))
* Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops
are populated through function
([#5084](#5084))
([77954ab](77954ab))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
AztecBot added a commit to AztecProtocol/barretenberg that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-package: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-package-v0.26.5...aztec-package-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Miscellaneous

* **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg.js-v0.26.5...barretenberg.js-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Miscellaneous

* **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-cli-v0.26.5...aztec-cli-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract
([#5059](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5059))
([cb9fdc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@cb9fdc6))
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-packages-v0.26.5...aztec-packages-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* Basic public reverts
([#4870](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4870))
([5cccc78](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@5cccc78))
* Deploying new inbox
([#5036](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5036))
([fed729d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fed729d))
* Detect unknown note type ids in compute_note_hash
([#5086](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5086))
([6206bec](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@6206bec))
* Easy deployment of protocol contracts in e2e
([#4983](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4983))
([480161f](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@480161f))
* IPA documentation
([#4924](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4924))
([48bd22e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@48bd22e))
* Nullifier read requests in public kernel
([#4910](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4910))
([0e44247](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0e44247))
* Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract
([#5059](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5059))
([cb9fdc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@cb9fdc6))
* Updating an SMT solver class
([#4981](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4981))
([4b94d58](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4b94d58))


### Bug Fixes

* Canonical contract address
([#5030](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5030))
([b2af880](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b2af880))
* Flaky deployment test
([#5035](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5035))
([039eafc](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@039eafc))
* Pull the correct platform image for noir
([#5097](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5097))
([3342371](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3342371))
* Sleep function memory leak
([#5023](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5023))
([a72cfea](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a72cfea)),
closes
[#4817](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4817)
* Storage v2
([#5027](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5027))
([fe3190e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fe3190e))
* Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies
([#5066](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5066))
([507c374](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@507c374))


### Miscellaneous

* Address warnings in noir test suite
([#4966](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4966))
([7ef4ef5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@7ef4ef5))
* Bootstrap noir natively if nargo is invalid
([#5034](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5034))
([df089de](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@df089de))
* Build avm transpiler if we are on mac
([#5039](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5039))
([c2966b9](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c2966b9))
* **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests
([#5065](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5065))
([58e1ff4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e1ff4))
* Cleanup of prover and verifier instances
([#4959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4959))
([f2fdefd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f2fdefd))
* Delete bootstrap scripts from `noir/noir-repo`
([#5044](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5044))
([add91ca](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@add91ca))
* Disable `hello_world_example` noir test in aztec-packages CI
([#5061](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5061))
([1be9243](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@1be9243))
* Join-split example Part 1
([#4965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965))
([b9de0f5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b9de0f5))
* Moving RootRollupInputs impl
([#5087](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5087))
([f3d9f9b](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f3d9f9b))
* Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops
are populated through function
([#5084](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5084))
([77954ab](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@77954ab))


### Documentation

* Parity circuit naming fixes
([#5076](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5076))
([c255255](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c255255))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg-v0.26.5...barretenberg-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* IPA documentation
([#4924](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4924))
([48bd22e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@48bd22e))
* Updating an SMT solver class
([#4981](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4981))
([4b94d58](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4b94d58))


### Bug Fixes

* Storage v2
([#5027](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5027))
([fe3190e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fe3190e))
* Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies
([#5066](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5066))
([507c374](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@507c374))


### Miscellaneous

* **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests
([#5065](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5065))
([58e1ff4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e1ff4))
* Cleanup of prover and verifier instances
([#4959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4959))
([f2fdefd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f2fdefd))
* Join-split example Part 1
([#4965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965))
([b9de0f5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b9de0f5))
* Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops
are populated through function
([#5084](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5084))
([77954ab](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@77954ab))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants